Designing a level and rethinking the challenges in Castle Adventure

Occasionally it pays to radically shake things up a bit. I’m never satisfied with my games when they’re struggling through that middle period of trying to iron out objectives vs technology vs style. So it’s during this time that I make the most drastic changes and run with them for a few days to see how I feel about them.

screenshot

Castle Adventure - rethinking the scale

I did it with Hoth Strike quite a lot when I wasn’t convinced by trying to emulate Defender’s game mechanics. The whole screen scrolling was driving me nuts since it meant I was forced to implement a scanner. But in the end that was a worthwhile exercise.

So with Castle Adventure I am now at the point where level objectives and puzzles are at the forefront of my mind. As it stands the game is played at pace with a number of missiles being hurled around by the player. The ghouls and zombies don’t fight back. Their only form of attack is to run head long in to the player and cause damage. I still rather like that since maze games for me don’t quite cut it when you’re avoiding missiles. Much better to do it PacMan style and dodge the bad guys.

So I sat scratching my head last night and thought about a game whereby you spend more time avoiding and less time hurling magic at enemies. This is precisely what the first Castle Adventure was all about and I really rather like it. I like the stealth nature of it in that you are looking further in to the level to plot your route without relying on the fire button.

To best achieve this I knew I had to alter the scale of things and present more for the player to do. So I did just that and came up with a different take on things.

You can see it here: www.wilfscorner.co.uk/sandpit/2/castle.php

Essentially the player is playing within the same game arena but on a smaller scale. He has much more room to move and a lot more (potentially) to have to solve.

I’m so taken by the challenge of avoiding monsters that I’m now also thinking about turning it on it’s head a little. One idea is to have a final locked room that requires a kind of jailer’s key. In that room is the level’s objective – perhaps some treasure. But the key is being carried by a jailer who obviously needs to drop it. To drop the key the player must stun him with magic.
There is an obvious down side here in that there is only a set amount of magic in each level. So I’m looking at respawning magic as an option.

Game design is fun when faced with such scenarios. As a rule of thumb I present a scenario for a goal and then flip it on it’s head to find the challenge. It works well most of the time. I may blog some of my game design theory for what it’s worth soon.

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Cody  On November 3, 2010 at 4:26 am

    http://www.wilfscorner.co.uk/sandpit/2/castle.php

    I know it’s a work in progress, but the only thing that immediately caught my attention was you can get stuck against a wall while pushing diagonally. In that situation, the wizard should slide down or across the wall in the direction it can move freely towards.

    Other than that, it is surprisingly fun. Great framework for a game, Mark.

    • markw1970  On November 3, 2010 at 7:33 am

      Ah precisely the area I’m working in. It’s a hangover from my ideas of having a free roaming wizard in 8 directions. I really need to refine my collision routines. Thanks for the comments. Always appreciated ;)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: